Wednesday, December 6, 2023

A cryptographic hash function is a mathematical algorithm that takes an input (message or data) of any length and produces a fixed-size output (hash or digest) that is unique to the input. The output of a cryptographic hash function is a digital fingerprint or signature of the input. The function is designed to be one-way, meaning that it is easy to compute the hash of the input, but it is very difficult (if not impossible) to compute the original input from the hash. Hash Functions in OTP play a crucial role in generating secure and unique passwords for each login attempt.


Cryptographic hash function

The purpose of a cryptographic hash function is to provide data integrity and authenticity by ensuring that the input has not been modified or tampered with. Cryptographic hash functions are widely used in various security applications, such as digital signatures, password storage, message authentication, and secure communication.

Some of the commonly used cryptographic hash functions include SHA-1, SHA-2, MD5, and BLAKE2, among others. The security of a cryptographic hash function is typically evaluated based on factors such as collision resistance, pre-image resistance, and avalanche effect, among others.


What Is The Difference Between SHA-1 And SHA-2?

SHA-1 and SHA-2 are both cryptographic hash functions that are used to generate a unique, fixed-size signature for a message or data. The signature, also known as a hash, is used to verify the authenticity and integrity of the data.

SHA-1 was developed in 1995 by the National Security Agency (NSA) and is widely used for various applications including digital signatures, code signing, and SSL certificates. However, due to its short hash length (160 bits), SHA-1 has become vulnerable to attacks and collision attacks have been demonstrated in recent years, which has led to the recommendation to move away from using SHA-1.

SHA-2, on the other hand, was developed as a successor to SHA-1 and was introduced in 2001. It includes four different hash functions (224, 256, 384, and 512 bits) that are more secure and provide a longer hash output, making it more resistant to collision attacks.

The main difference between them is:

  1. Security: SHA-2 is considered more secure than SHA-1 as it produces a longer hash output (224, 256, 384, or 512 bits) compared to SHA-1 (160 bits).

  2. Length: SHA-2 produces a larger hash value than SHA-1, making it more difficult for attackers to compromise the integrity of the data.

  3. Algorithm: SHA-2 uses a different algorithm than SHA-1, which results in a more secure hash output.

Hash functions SHA-1 and SHA-2 serve the same purpose, SHA-2 is considered to be more secure due to its longer hash length and improved algorithm. As a result, it is recommended to use SHA-2 for new applications and systems.


Strengthen Your Cybersecurity with these Lesser-Known Cryptographic Hash Functions

There are several other cryptographic hash functions in addition to SHA-1 and SHA-2, some of which include:

  1. MD5: A 128-bit hash function that is widely used for various applications, but has been shown to be vulnerable to collision attacks and is no longer considered secure.

  2. SHA-3: A family of hash functions that were selected through a public competition and were designed to be more secure and resistant to attacks than previous hash functions.

  3. BLAKE2: A fast and secure hash function that is designed for a wide range of applications including password hashing and file integrity checking.

  4. Keccak: A family of hash functions that were selected as the SHA-3 winner in 2012 and have been widely adopted for various security applications.

  5. Tiger: A 192-bit hash function that was designed for fast performance and is widely used in various security applications.

These are just a few examples of cryptographic hash functions. The choice of a hash function depends on the specific requirements and security needs of the application.


Using Cryptographic Hash Functions in OTP Generation

Cryptographic hash functions are used in the process of generating OTP by taking a secret key and a counter value, hashing them together using the chosen hash function, and then truncating the result to create the one-time password. The process is repeated for each new OTP generated, with the counter value being incremented each time. The use of a cryptographic hash function helps ensure that the OTP is unique, unpredictable, and cannot be reverse-engineered to derive the original key or counter value.

This article explores what hash function collisions are, how they can affect the security of cryptographic systems, and how modern hash functions protect against collisions. It also covers some well-known attacks on hash functions and methods to protect against them.

Hash Function Collisions: What They Are and Why They Matter in Cryptography

Hash function collisions occur when two different input messages produce the same hash value. In the context of cryptography, this can be a serious issue as an attacker can craft fraudulent data that has the same hash value as genuine data, leading to potential system vulnerabilities.

SHA-1 is considered vulnerable to collision attacks, which can allow an attacker to create multiple input messages that produce the same hash code. In the context of generating OTPs, this vulnerability means that an attacker could potentially generate an OTP that matches the hash code of another valid OTP. This could allow the attacker to bypass the OTP authentication mechanism and gain unauthorized access to a system or application.

Using SHA-1 for generating OTPs is therefore not recommended, as it can compromise the security of the OTPs and the systems that rely on them. It is important to use stronger hash functions, such as SHA-256 or SHA-3, to minimize the risk of collision attacks and ensure the security of OTPs.


The probability of a collision

The probability of a collision occurring in a hash function like SHA-1 depends on the length of the hash output and the number of messages that are hashed. In the case of SHA-1, the output size is 160 bits, which means that there are a total of 2^160 possible hash values. However, the birthday attack, which is a type of collision attack, reduces the effective security of SHA-1 to approximately 2^80 operations.

This means that if an attacker performs 2^80 hash operations, there is a 50% chance that they will find a collision. While this may seem like a large number, it is not beyond the reach of determined attackers, especially those with access to large amounts of computing power. In addition, the risk of collision attacks only increases over time as computers become more powerful and new attack techniques are developed.

Given these factors, it is important to use a hash function like SHA-256 or SHA-3 for generating OTPs, as these algorithms provide stronger security and are less vulnerable to collision attacks.


Common Attacks On Hash Functions

There are several known attacks on hash functions that can be used by malicious actors to compromise security systems.

  1. Brute-force attack. This method involves trying every possible input value in order to find input data that produces the same hash code as the original data.

  2. Differential cryptanalysis. This attack involves modifying the input data and comparing the modified hash code with the original hash code to detect the structure of the hash function.

  3. Birthday attack. This method involves creating several input messages that produce the same hash code and using them to create fraudulent data.

  4. Long-tail attack. This attack involves searching for input data that produces a hash code with a long tail, which allows the attacker to compute fake data with the same hash code.

To protect against such attacks, many modern hash functions have been designed to minimize the possibility of such attacks. However, some old hash functions, such as MD5, are more vulnerable to these attacks.


SHA-1 was widely used for one-time password (OTP) generation in the past due to its early adoption and its acceptance as a secure hash function. However, as weaknesses in the algorithm were discovered and computing power increased, the security of SHA-1 diminished. Despite this, it may still be used in some legacy systems or applications that have not been updated to use more secure hash functions.

Additionally, some systems may use SHA-1 in combination with other security measures to provide an additional layer of protection. 

However, it is generally recommended to use stronger hash functions such as SHA-2 or SHA-3 for OTP generation in order to ensure the highest level of security.

Generate OTP with! You can also leverage our tool for debugging and diagnosing any authentication-related issues you may encounter. Our free tool supports all standard OATH algorithms. Choose the algorithm that perfectly aligns with your requirements: TOTP for time-based passwords, HOTP for counter-based passwords, or OCRA for challenge-response authentication. At, we provide the flexibility you need to ensure your authentication process is seamless and secure. Visit us now!

Choose your TOTP token


Subscribe our Newsletter for new blog posts & tips. Let's stay updated!



David Smith 05.05.2023 - 05:18

Magnificent beat! I wish to apprentice while you amend your website, how could i subscribe for a blog web site? The account helped me a acceptable deal.

I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear idea

Mohamed 08.05.2023 - 09:27

Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your web site and in accession capital
to assert that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your
blog posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing to your feeds and even I achievement you access consistently fast.


Leave a Comment


John McHacker

John was a computer programmer and hacker known for his expertise in breaking into secure computer systems. He developed a reputation as a master of computer security and was often hired by companies to test the strength of their cybersecurity measures.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept